Tuesday, October 25, 2005

On loss

News item: The United States has recorded its 2,000th death in Iraq since hostilities began.

As tragic as the total number is, this is as good a time as any to reflect on what it means:
  • 2,000 families have lost a loved one.
  • 2,000 brothers, sisters, moms, dads, husbands, wives, sons, daughters, friends...all gone.
  • 2,000 people frozen in time, who will never fulfill their destiny.
  • Countless others left behind, their lives going on, somehow, without them.
Tim Harper is a columnist for the Toronto Star. He wrote this piece, Matt Kimmell's funeral, that tells one such story. I had difficulty getting through it as I thought how easily it could be any one of us. Or any one from my own little world.

I guess if we all spent enough time searching, we could find similar stories about the other 1,999. Of course, by then, that number will have tragically grown even larger.

Your turn: Why?

13 comments:

Courtney said...

Because we have a leader with the intelligence quotient of a dull pencil, who's intent on "avenging Daddy" and flexing his political muscle, and lies about the policies and motives that cause him to give the order. All at the expense of the American people. A leader who lied about his own military service then cavalierly sends our military to an unwinnable war. A leader who refuses to take consequences for his actions and leaves the country he heads vulnerable to further attack and scorn.

2008 will not be here soon enough.

Terry said...

Hi Carmi, its hard to watch our neighbours to the south struggle through this. It has divided their country very thoroughly, which makes having a common cause that much more difficult. I hope that it gets resolved quickly and well, and that their soldiers can come home.

colleen said...

The privitization of Iraq...geopolitical advantage...Oil...stupidity...But not the reasons we were given. It's a crime.

Zinnia Cyclamen said...

What Colleen said. And could we also remember the families and friends of over 25,000 Iraqi civilians who have died, so far, in this conflict?

Krista said...

amazing how the world feeds on tragedy and horrors of hate, rather then the love we have such capacity for. The sheer volume of everything being reported is an attestment to who we (as a human race) seem intent on portraying ourselves to be as a collective whole. My two cents - little relation to the specific topic at hand I understand...but I felt a need to comment.

The Mistress of the Dark said...

There is no good answer to this. But Courtney and Colleen both have expressed my sentiments on the matter.

Elvis Costello changed the lyrics to the song A Scarlet Tide to go "Admit you lied, and bring the boys back home."

Wish our not so intelligent leader would do just that.

Pieces of Me said...

IT is a tragedy to lose so many great people who are over there fighting for our country. But through this horrific number you forget to mention all the people who have now been saved. I mean there were so many saved out of the hands of Sadam. The people in Iraq are thankful we are there and the soldiers are proud to fight knowing that we are taking a stand that if ANYONE comes over to attack us on our own soil we will fight back. We have captured Sadam and that right there did so much good for so many people. We still have many more evil men to capture...I have a cousin and a best friend over there right now and they miss home but they are proud to be fighting and we should all be proud of them. I think a lot of people are forgetting that because they see the death toll rising and they just want our boys home...Pray for them but be so proud that they are fighting for us! It is incredible seeing what the media shows...always tragedy but the pictures I receive from my cousin show a different story..gratefulness from the Iraqi people that we are over there...It shows heroes...each and every soldier over there...As for our commander in chief I think it is ridiculous the way people talk about him...whether or not you dont like him there should be a level of respect and unless you are the one taking on an incredible job I dont think there shouold be bad mouthing...I hated clinton and the only thing bad I EVER said about him was that he was cheating on his wife. Now if you would have rather Kerry been our president that really would have been interesting because throughout all of the debates he kept mentioning that he had some "plan" but not once did he mention what that was...he had no clue! Bush is a great leader and I will leave it at that...Hope you are having a great day Carmi! TTYL

John D Schultz said...

I agree with "pieces of me". Yes, 2,000 soldiers have died and approximately 30,000 civilians have died. However, what about the 100,000 Kurds that were executed in 1988? Or what about the 20,000 Iranians that were killed due to Hussein's use of mustard gas in the Iraq-Iran war?

The atrocities of Hussein are justification for the removal of regime. Although death to anyone is sad, does not a safer, democratic, non-executionary goverment justify the war.

Plain Jane said...

The "why?" is evident - look to our White House administration for a plethora of reasons they will not fully admit but rather conceal with falsity.

My brother returns there today after a short visit home. This makes his third tour over there and we continue to hope he doesn't get added to the ever growing list of people that have lost their lives... on both "sides".

A Woman Changed said...

I don't know that we'll understand all of the reasons Why anytime soon, but I do agree that the media slant unfairly emphasizes the soldier count and it doesn't shed light on the transformation that is taking place in Iraq. We can't police the world and go after every murderous dictator - but I'm glad we got this one. He and his sons were pure evil. I have no doubt that there were geo-political issues involved as well as concern about oil availability for the future. I totally disagree that this is all about Avenging Daddy. Yes, I think the WMDs fears were pumped up to get us there - but the motivation was to weaken a growing threat. I wish we weren't there, but I do think that we are helping the Iraqi people and stabilizing an area that has been a growing concern.

Easy said...

This number doesn't take into account the number of soldiers (and civilians!) maimed by this unneccessary war. Iraq was not a threat to the US prior to thie invasion, but it has since become the rallying point for terrorists.

I'll shut up now before I start a flame here.

kenju said...

Because Dubya had to avenge Daddy. Plain and Simple. Simple also refers to the person.

Courtney said...

The WMD's weren't just "pumped up", Jill. THEY DIDN'T EXIST. And we can't just be "the world's policemen" to the ones we feel like policing. We either spread our military dangerously thin all over the world intervening against dictators and into civil wars that are going on for decades, or we don't at all. This war is about oil, revenge, and political bullying. My heart goes out to the hardworking soldiers giving their lives for this pitiful conflict.

The man in the office is acting in such a manner that he's eroding the respect people should have for the office, Pieces of Me. Never has there been someone less qualified and more dangerous sitting in that room.